[email protected] +91 9840521421 Scholarly Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Refereed Journal e-ISSN 2583-5300 Since 2022
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2026
  4. Vol. 5 Issue 3
  5. Article
Original Article

Adaptive Graph-Attention Model for Multi-Step PM2.5 Forecasting: Cross-City Validation Across Gurugram and Mumbai

Open Access Peer Reviewed Crossref DOI

Authors

  • Murali Sagar Varma Sagi1
  • Kuda Nageswara Rao2

1 PG student, Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Andhra University College of Engineering, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2 Professor, Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Andhra University College of Engineering, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Article Information

Published Online
September-December 2026
Pages
149-153
Article Type
Original Article
Check for updates
check update

Abstract

View PDF

An adaptive Graph-Attention (GAT) spatial layer has previously been shown, in earlier unpublished work by the author, to outperform a fixed, distance-based spatial weighting scheme for hyperlocal PM2.5 forecasting on a 62-station monitoring network in Gurugram, India, under a controlled, capacity-matched comparison. Like nearly every graph-based air quality forecasting study in the reviewed literature, that result was established on a single city, leaving open whether the advantage is a property of the method or an artefact of that network's density or geography. This paper reports an independent cross-city validation: the identical fixed-weight-versus- adaptive-GAT comparison, matched in parameter count and trained under an unmodified protocol, is applied to a separately collected dataset from Mumbai, India. Of 29 candidate CPCB/MPCB/BMC stations (hourly data, 2025), 19 were retained after a data-quality screen; wind speed was unavailable, so the feature set was reduced from seven inputs to six, applied identically to both models. Across three seeds and four forecast horizons (1, 6, 12, 24 hours — 12 seed-horizon comparisons), the adaptive model achieved a lower RMSE than the fixed-weight model in 10 of 12 cases; a paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test rejects the null hypothesis of no systematic difference (W = 3, p =0.0024, two-sided). The two exceptions were both small and both at the 24-hour horizon. These results provide direct empirical evidence, to our knowledge not previously reported for this comparison, that the advantage of adaptive over fixed spatial weighting is not specific to the Gurugram network, while surfacing genuine dataset differences a future cross-city comparison should account for.

APC from ₹1200 + 18% GST

Peer-reviewed open access₹1200 Indian (₹1400 with DOI)$80 USD internationalpaid after acceptance Peer-reviewed open access₹1200 Indian$80 USD international ₹1200 Indian · $80 intl

  • CrossRef DOI
  • ISSN 2583-5300
  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Plagiarism Checked
  • Google Scholar
Submit Paper